Reality Check
Available bachelor
looking for chicks
who want boy babies
History says that Anne Boleyn did not go mad
before being executed in the Tower of London.
Actually, she was quite cool, and the fact that
Donizetti makes her go mad is only an operatic
convention. Her last words were carefully
recorded. Here is the offcial version:
"Good Christian people, I am come hither to
die, for according to the law, and by the law I am
judged to die, and therefore I will speak nothing
against it. I am come hither to accuse no man, nor
to speak anything of that, whereof I am accused
and condemned to die, but I pray God save the
king and send him long to reign over you, for
a gentler nor a more merciful prince was there
never: and to me he was ever a good, a gentle and sovereign lord. And if any person will meddle of
my cause, I require them to judge the best. And
thus I take my leave of the world and of you all, and I heartily desire you all to pray for me. O Lord
have mercy on me, to God I commend my soul."
That's not the speech of a madwoman.
Obviously, she was a bit delusional in referring to
Henry as "…a gentler nor a more merciful prince
was there never." Maybe she was hoping the
quality of the speech would get her a reprieve. She
then removed her headdress, and began repeating a
brief prayer, as her attendants secured a blindfold.
She bowed her head, and the executioner cut it off
with one clean blow.
That's the offcial version. Another possibility
is that she went down spitting and screaming and
cursing the bloody misogynist responsible for her
death. He was, after all, the person who wrote
history to accommodate that category of reality
later described as things that ought to be true,
even if they are not.
Donizetti's British Cycle
In 1830, Anna Bolena became Donizetti's
breakthrough opera. Though he had already
composed over two dozen operas, this one made his
name, separating him from hack rivals. In the next
13 years he would write over forty more, several
now opera house staples: Lucia, La Favorite,
Elixir, and Don Pasquale. But his "British
Cycle"-- the frst focusing on Henry VIII's
second marriage, the next two on Elizabeth
I's checkered reign - had to be rediscovered
by modern audiences. This came with Callas
in the 1950s, Montserrat Caballé in the 60s,
and Beverly Sills a decade later.
As we will see today, the trilogy begins
with Anne Boleyn's tragic demise. Her
rise to fame, at the expense of Henry's frst
queen, Catherine of Aragon, was short lived,
only long enough to bring forth Elizabeth,
who would be crowned 25 years later.
Failing to produce a male heir, Anne was quickly
replaced by Jane Seymour, who did produce the
future Edward VI, but poor Jane died in childbirth.
(For the record, Catherine, who was Henry's wife
for almost 20 years, produced four male heirs, but
all died in infancy.)
The full story of Henry's next three wives need
not trouble us any more than they did Henry, other
than to say the politically motivated marriage to
hapless Anne of Cleves was short lived, as was
Catherine Howard's, who also paid with her head;
the last, Catherine Parr, outlived Henry, which was
no easy task.
Maria Stuarda (1834), the second installment
of the "British Cycle," dramatizes Elizabeth I's
disposal of Mary, deposed Queen of Scotland.
Historically, Elizabeth protected her for almost 20
years before Mary became part of a plot to usurp
the crown and return England to the Catholic fold.
In the debate over executing Mary, ever-crafty
Elizabeth managed to be on both sides, fnally
agreeing – "with a white conscience" – to the
beheading. (Readers will remember that Mary's
execution led Philip II of Spain to launch his ill-
fated Armada the following year, in 1588.)
The plot for Maria Stuarda, however, is short on
Catholic conspiracy and long on rival love,
the triangle composed of Elizabeth, Mary,
and the Earl of Leicester. In the end, Mary is
sacrifced on the altar of jealousy, not politics.
Whatever ambitions Mary had are little in
evidence; rather, it's in a jealous rage that Elizabeth condemns her to death, bringing us
a glorious scene of Mary's calm sacrifce.
Robert Devereux (1837), the fnal
installment of the "Cycle," is yet another
dramatization of Elizabeth enraged over
unrequited love, this time sacrifcing Robert
Devereux, Earl of Essex.
Though the libretto
confates the turbulent end to Essex's dashing
career and failed Irish command, his execution
for treason is intact; but here too the love triangle
between Elizabeth (who would have been 68 at the
time), Sarah (Duchess of Nottingham), and Essex
repeats the contours of Maria Stuarda.
Despite
everyone's good efforts, including Sarah's duped
husband, Elizabeth sends Essex to the ax, his
usurpation submerged in the love triangle.
So this is Donizetti's operatic version of the
English Tudors, rejecters of the True Faith. That
they were also cruel and unjust is best put by the
Chorus at the end of Act I of Anna Bolena, if we
include Elizabeth with Henry in the condemnation:
Ah! how much evil has been inficted
by the English throne,
how much evil,
no one more fatal has ascended to it
than he who explodes in rage.
Here innocence receives the death
that crime contrives.
-Gil Davis |